摘要： 在数据权益民事侵权纠纷中，针对数据权属与利益分配的争议较大，最高人民法院最新发布的第264号指导性案例确认的主体之间的数据权益，为进一步贯彻落实《数据二十条》和合理保护数据加工使用权益等内容释放了信号。通过分析数据资源持有权主体与数据来源者的关系、数据资源持有权主体与数据处理者的关系以及数据来源者与数据处理者的关系，发现数据来源者、数据处理者与数据资源持有权主体之间不仅有主体身份的分离，也会发生主体身份的竞合，从而限定数据权益主体范围。同时，结合案例又分别从数据资源持有权、数据加工使用权与数据产品经营权等方面，限定数据权益的内容。以此，为司法裁判关于数据权益主体与内容的确认提供进一步强有力的解释。

中图分类号：D922.16;F49文献标志码：ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2026.06.010中文引用格式：郭艳芳.案例分析视角下的主体数据权益限定［J］.网络安全与数据治理，2026，45（6）：75-81.
英文引用格式：Guo Yanfang.Limitation of subject data rights and interests from the perspective of case analysis［J］.Cyber Security and Data Governance，2026，45（6）：75-81.

Limitation of subject data rights and interests from the perspective of case analysis

Abstract： In civil infringement disputes over data rights,there is significant controversy regarding data ownership and benefit distribution.The Supreme People′s Court′s recently released guiding case No.264 confirms the data rights between subjects,signaling the further implementation of the "Data Twenty Provisions" and the reasonable protection of data processing and usage rights.By analyzing the relationships between data resource holders and data sources,data resource holders and data processors,as well as data sources and data processors,it is found that there is not only a separation of subject identities among data sources,data processors,and data resource holders,but also a concurrence of subject identities,which limits the scope of data rights subjects.At the same time,the content of data rights is also limited from the perspectives of data resource ownership,data processing usage rights,and data product management rights.Thus,this provides further strong explanations for judicial decisions regarding the confirmation of data rights subjects and content.

Key words : data source; data processing; data resource; data provider; data processor