摘要： 为应对侵犯数据隐私权的情况，欧洲人权法院在“不干涉原则”的基础上，创设了“无支配原则”。“无支配原则”的形成原因有二：一是干涉行为本质发生变化，二是“无支配自由”理论更具说服力。借鉴欧洲人权法院数据隐私权的保护机制，我国数据隐私权的保护机制可以从两个方面完善：一是调整侵权行为和损害结果的证明标准，二是强化法官对合目的性和正当性的说理能力。

中图分类号：D99
文献标识码：A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.06.003
引用格式：管朝辉.欧洲人权法院数据隐私权的保护机制［J］.网络安全与数据治理，2023，42（6）：15-20.

Protection mechanism of the European Court of Human Rights on data privacy

Abstract： The European Court of Human Rights has created “nondomination principle” based on “noninterference principle”. The formation of “nondomination principle” has two reasons: the nature of the tort has changed and the “nondomination freedom” is convincing. Drawing on protection mechanism of the European Court of Human Rrights on date privacy, China can be improved from two ways: on one hand, the mechanism is to adjust the standard of proof of tort and damage, on the other, it is to strengthen the judge′s reasoning ability to purposiveness and legitimacy.

Key words : data privacy; the European Court of Human Rights; noninterference principle; nondominance principle