摘要： 算法在带来便捷的同时，也持续对公民的知情权、隐私权甚至生命健康权等构成威胁。由于算法的技术壁垒和商业秘密保护政策，算法的自动决策过程成了一个“黑箱”，个人无法得知决策作出的过程。既有研究多从算法相对人的立场出发，强调通过算法公开、数据赋权或伦理审查回应上述风险，但相关制度在实践中均面临不同程度的可行性限制。算法规制困境的关键并不完全在于解释权等权利设计不足，而在于算法决策过程中算法主体义务配置的结构性不足。因此，算法规制应从算法主体义务设计出发，在算法设计、运行及诉讼阶段三个层面，明确算法主体义务，助力算法解释权的实现。

中图分类号：D922.17文献标志码：ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2026.09.011
中文引用格式：陈芷莹. 探索自动决策算法解释权——聚焦于算法主体的义务［J］.网络安全与数据治理，2026，45（9）：84-91.
英文引用格式：Chen Zhiying. Investigating the right to algorithmic explanation in China: a focus on the obligations of algorithm developers［J］.Cyber Security and Data Governance，2026，45（9）：84-91.

Investigating the right to algorithmic explanation in China: a focus on the obligations of algorithm developers

Abstract： While algorithms bring convenience, they also pose persistent threats to citizens′ rights to information, privacy, and even life and health. Owing to technical barriers and the protection of trade secrets, automated algorithmic decisionmaking has taken on the character of a "black box", rendering individuals unable to ascertain how decisions are made. Existing studies have largely approached these risks from the perspective of algorithmic subjects, emphasizing regulatory responses such as algorithmic transparency, data empowerment, and ethical review. However, each of these approaches encounters varying degrees of practical limitations. The core difficulty of algorithmic regulation lies not solely in deficiencies in the design of rights such as the right to explanation, but rather in the structural inadequacy of obligation allocation among algorithmic actors throughout the decision-making process.

Key words : algorithmic decision-making; right to explanation; algorithmic subjects; allocation of obligations